Eastern District of Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,840
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2017cv03264
Plaintiff: GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDWARD G. SMITH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
STATON v. DICKINSON et al
as 5:2017cv03236
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
FULTZ v. ROTHERMEL et al
as 2:2017cv03237
Plaintiff: JACOB L. FULTZ
Defendant: JACOB C. ROTHERMEL, TYREE C. BLOCKER
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
HOFFMAN et al v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2017cv03223
Plaintiff: THEODORE HOFFMAN , MICHAEL HOFFMAN , PENN & ARCH, LLC and others
Defendant: MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN, NORRISTOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
MILLS v. JOHN DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2017cv03220
Plaintiff: REGINALD MILLS
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
BONAPARTE et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv03209
Plaintiff: RODNEY BONAPARTE , APRIL KILSON
Defendant: BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Plaintiff: CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant: CITY OF PHILA, CITY OF PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION COMMISSIONER, JOHN MANDROS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
OSHELL et al v. MOFFETT et al
as 2:2017cv03211
Plaintiff: BRYAN M. OSHELL , JESSICA OSHELL
Defendant: WILLIAM MOFFETT, UPPER POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP, SEAN FARRELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BOARDER v. SESSIONS et al
as 5:2017cv03185
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
CAMPELLONE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03149
Plaintiff: ROBERT CAMPELLONE
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?