District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 8,815
FERGUSON v. TICE et al
as 1:2018cv00388
Respondent: ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MICHAEL D. FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. TRATE
as 1:2018cv00390
Respondent: B. TRATE
Petitioner: ANTHONY BERRY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RANKIN v. TICE et al
as 2:2018cv01670
Respondent: ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARDY v. MARIANI et al
as 2:2018cv01663
Defendant: ANTHONY MARIANI, SHEILA A. LADNER
Plaintiff: KEVIN L. HARDY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv01661
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: GREGORY SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. TICE et al
as 1:2018cv00384
Respondent: ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: DAMAR LAMONT JORDAN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROMANSKY v. GORGAN et al
as 2:2018cv01654
Defendant: MARGARET M. GORGAN, JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff: STEVE ROMANSKY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ENCAPERA v. ENCAPERA et al
as 1:2018cv00387
Defendant: ANDERSON, BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA, PA, RICHARD ENCAPERA and others
Plaintiff: DANA R. ENCAPERA
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
O'CONNOR v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00383
Defendant: ACTING WARDEN
Plaintiff: ARIAN O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART et al
as 3:2018cv00252
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART, SACERITY OFFICE
Plaintiff: JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?