US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
LESKO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv01049
Petitioner:
JOHN C. LESKO
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRISPELL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
DANIEL CRISPELL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFF MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STATON v. FOLINO et al
as 3:2011cv00144
Petitioner:
ANDRE STATON
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUMHAMMERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv00258
Petitioner:
RICHARD BAUMHAMMERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REED v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv00110
Petitioner:
DENNIS C. REED
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAIRSTON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv01119
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Petitioner:
KENNETH HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00866
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEELE v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv00626
Petitioner:
ROLAND STEELE
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS B. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
TEDFORD v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv00409
Petitioner:
DON TEDFORD
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PENDLETON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
