US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Teron v. Home Depot Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
MARIA TERON
Defendant:
Home Depot Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Camacho-Duran
as 3:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Fidel Camacho-Duran
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Santiago-Santiago et al v. State Insurance Fund Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ivonne Y Santiago-Santiago and Felix Rosa-Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Insurance Fund Co., Jesus M Rodrguez-Rosa and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Villalobos et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Villalobos and Puerto Rico Police Deparment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
