US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,278
Blevins v. Ellers et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bryan S Blevins
Defendant:
Brian Ellers and Aaron White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Malik Scott
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Antonelli
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gray v. McConnell et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Gray
Defendant:
Joyce McConnell, Sandy Metcalf and Vicky Afisov
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benanti v. USA
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Michael Benanti
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coleman v. FCI Milan
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent:
FCI Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simerly v. Blount County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Simerly
Defendant:
Blount County Jail Medical Staff and Nurse Brittany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Montel Johnson
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care and Hamilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Clotfelter et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Henry
Defendant:
Eric Clotfelter, Wayne Barton, II, Mike Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
