US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,558
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe #038 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Doe #038
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #041 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Doe #041
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe #040 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
John Doe #040
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell et al v. The City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell, Marvin Young and Jeremy Slayden
Defendant:
The City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashley et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Ashley, Katelyn Phillips and Deannia Keith
Defendant:
Coltan Jones, Sheriff Michael Reagon and Fentress County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
