US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Burns v. Bethel University
as 2:2014cv03016
Plaintiff:
Robert C Burns, Jr
Defendant:
Bethel University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Lynch v. Serenity Towers at Midtown Memphis, LLC
as 2:2014cv02749
Plaintiff:
Rolonda Lynch
Defendant:
Serenity Towers at Midtown Memphis, LLC, GMF-Serenity Towers, LLC and Highland Terrace Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Durrett v. GMF-Serenity Towers, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
Eunice Payne Durrett
Defendant:
GMF-Serenity Towers, LLC, Sheilah Hooks and Memphis Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. Fairway Towers Apartments Council of Co-owners et al
as 2:2014cv02422
Plaintiff:
Pansy Swinson
Defendant:
Fairway Towers Apartments Council of Co-owners , Wright Property Management, Inc. and Mario Lara
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. Cowans et al
as 2:2014cv02366
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Hayes, Sr.
Defendant:
Dwight Cowans, Tom Leatherwood, David Lenoir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Frierson v. Elliot et al
as 2:2013cv02458
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Frierson
Defendant:
Lewis E Elliot, Robert Elliot and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Collins v. Waste Management
as 2:2012cv03085
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Collins
Defendant:
Waste Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hutchins v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
as 2:2012cv02410
Plaintiff:
Ruth Hutchins
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. City of Memphis
as 2:2011cv03110
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
v. Hatley et al
as 2:2011cv02974
Defendant:
Ruby L. Hatley and Central Defense Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
