US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,980
McDonald v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Defendant:
Karl Jackson and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wiser
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Julian Wiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Starta et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Sebastian D. Vaughn and Arion J. Boggs
Defendant:
Frank Starta, FNU Giles, FNU Pulawski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pirtle v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
Arthur Pirtle
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Franklin Fitch
Defendant:
Cynthia Shaw, Officer Aimes, Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hardy
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atha v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Michael Atha
Defendant:
Core Civic, Sevier County, Knox County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Derrick Thompson, Gabriel Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv02806
Plaintiff:
Markeith McDaniel
Defendant:
James Williams, Terrance Moore and Anita J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv02793
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
