US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 22,792
Binion v. Pod Moving & Storage et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Seth Binion
Defendant:
Pods Moving & Storage, McKinney P.D., Collin County Criminal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ: Case electronically transferred to (Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division).
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Leandry v. USA
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Ismael Leandry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Greg Russel and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. USA
as 6:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Pablo Antonio Sandoval
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Montoya v. USA
as 4:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Ilder De Jesus Quiceno Montoya
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
