US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 11,921
Garza v. LNU 1:24-cv-057
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fermin Miguel Garza
Defendant:
FNU LNU 1:24-cv-057
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deary v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deary
Defendant:
B. Collier, B. Reitsma, T. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Mikeska et al
as 3:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stone
Defendant:
Anton Mikeska and Tow Pro Wreckage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pippins v. Rasco et al
as 3:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pippins
Defendant:
Richardson Q Rasco, Steven Cliften and Felicia Pitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. US Postal Employees et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson and Ronald Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Employees and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bulls v. TDCJ
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bulls
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
