US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 435
Stilb v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Brittany Stilb
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bryant v. Envoy Air Inc
as 3:2020cv00708
Defendant:
Envoy Air Inc
Plaintiff:
Michelle R Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jimenez v. SRD Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00216
Defendant:
MJC CANTINA LLC., MJCI REAL ESTATE HOLDING LLC, MERCADO JUAREZ CAFE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Gunnels v. Yurman Retail North America LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00381
Defendant:
David Yurman Enterprises LLC, David Yurman Inc., David Yurman Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi Gunnels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Battle et al v. Oil States Energy Services LLC
as 3:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Oil States Energy Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Joseph Battle and Edward Darokey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Suliveras v. Whataburger Restaurants LLC
as 3:2020cv00202
Defendant:
Whataburger Restaurants LLC
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Suliveras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibson v. Hoshizaki America Inc
as 4:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Hoshizaki America Inc
Plaintiff:
Victoria Gibson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Punch v. City of DeSoto
as 3:2020cv00029
Defendant:
DeSoto Chamber of Commerce and City of DeSoto
Plaintiff:
Shmara Punch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rietz v. Cisco Ford Equipment Inc et al
as 6:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Cisco Equipment Rentals LLC, Cromeens Hollomon Sibert & Sub, Cisco Ford Equipment Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Rietz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Beckett v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marquis Beckett
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
