US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Jaros v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2019cv00804
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Jaros
Defendant:
Jessica M Jaros, Ken Paxton, In His Official Capacity and State Of Texas
Sustainable Shark Alliance , et al. v. Smith, et al.
as 4:2019cv00561
Defendant:
THE HONRABLE KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Texas, THE HONORABLE CARTER SMITH, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, Ken Paxton and others
Plaintiff:
SUSTAINABLE SHARK ALLIANCE, VENICE SEAFOOD, LLC and OCHOA SEAFOOD ENTERPRISES
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Marlon et al v. Abbott et al
as 4:2018cv03555
Defendant:
Nanette Y Marlon, Mara Fiessen, Steve Roddy and others
Plaintiff:
Oliveira Florinda Marlon, Eden Marlon and Ezio Marlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hines v. Quillivan et al
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Hines
Defendant:
Sue Allen, George Antuna, Carlos Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2018cv02183
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Davis
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Amy L Woodard-Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Momper v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Petitioner:
Scott Momper
Respondent:
State of Texas and Amadonna Momper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Caesar et al v. CPS 8 315 Judicial Juvenile
as 4:2018cv00664
Plaintiff:
White El Shaddai Caesar, T.M. and E.M.
Defendant:
CPS 8 315 Judicial Juvenile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pompura v. Millard et al
as 4:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Shane M Pompura
Defendant:
Lisa A Millard and Conrad L Moren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pompura v Guiney
as 4:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
Shane M Pompura
Defendant:
Kirstin M Guiney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
