US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,972
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Mahoney
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Keep Separate Inmate Assailants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jean v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner:
Joseph F. Jean
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBorde v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01371
Petitioner:
Christopher DeBorde
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Mayorkas
as 4:2024cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hinton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Cordell Deonzio Hinton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
