US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27,269
Hightower v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01439
Petitioner:
Nirvana Hightower
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyce v. Tillman et al
as 4:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
Officer Tillman, Officer Jaramillo and Sgt. Kessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner:
Joseph F. Jean
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silvas v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas, Jr
Defendant:
Lt. Warner, Sgt. Guiterez, Sgt. Syler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desouze v. Dr. Hemant Patel
as 4:2024cv01400
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Dr. Hemant Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
