US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 21,963
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff: Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Blake et al
as 6:2019cv00052
Plaintiff: Michael Cardora Roberson
Defendant: Christian A. Dickinson, J.E. Blake, Elizabeth Z. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Nino-Guerrero v. USA
as 5:2019cv00086
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Karen Thalia Nino-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lozano v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00170
Petitioner: Avie Lee Lozano
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews et al v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv00192
Petitioner: Ryan Antonio Matthews, Bryan William Garris
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Davis
as 6:2019cv00051
Petitioner: Charles L Sullivan
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gibson v. USA Do not docket in this case. File only in [4:12-cr-600-1].
as 4:2019cv02143
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Earnest Gibson, III
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dodson v. Davis
as 4:2019cv02141
Defendant: Warden Lorie Davis
Plaintiff: Verten Dodson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Daley v. USA Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:15-cr-00512-1 .
as 4:2019cv02116
Petitioner: Christopher Donrick Daley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Davis (CASE FILED IN ERROR)
as 5:2019cv00084
Petitioner: Reginald King, Jr
Respondent: Warden Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?