US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 27,276
Boyce v. B. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
B. Smith, T. Mitchell and A. Wasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Mayorkas
as 4:2024cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alatan v. The United State of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19cr00633 .
as 4:2024cv01364
Petitioner:
Olotin Alfred Alatan
Respondent:
The United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Kevin Dehart, Jennifer Lewman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Gaido
as 4:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Ardis Broussard
Defendant:
Judge Kathryn Colleen Gaido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Cordell Deonzio Hinton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayward v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Glen Lee Hayward
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Sargeant T. Pickins and Detention Officer N. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01325
Petitioner:
Lester Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
