US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 27,255
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. John B. Holmes et al
as 4:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Gerald Allen Perry
Defendant:
John B. Holmes, Ken R. Williamson, Boyd Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Sayantan Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Sayantan (SY) Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Durrell Singleton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muniz v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Juan Muniz, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Deputy Adam Johnson and Deputy Zachary Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughey v. USA
as 4:2024cv01141
Petitioner:
Frasiel Hughey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Valier v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01165
Petitioner:
Nkrumah Lumumba Valier
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giagnacovo v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Hector Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Unknown Detention Officers and Unknown Detention Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Estelle Unit
as 4:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Robert Caldwell
Defendant:
Estelle Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
