US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,488
Hille v. Midland County Detention Center et al
as 7:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Drevon Hille
Defendant: Midland County Detention Center and Officer Quintana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Griffis
as 7:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Lyndon Walker
Defendant: Sheriff Mike Griffis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Rayford
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Joshua Stewart
Defendant: Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Avery Cato
Defendant: President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00076
Petitioner: Travonn Johnson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Pratt et al
as 6:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Tracy Lynn Jackson
Defendant: Mark Pratt and Darbie Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Vazquez et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Pamela P. Kramer
Defendant: Eric Vazquez, Michael Gonzales, Scott Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00133
Petitioner: Tracy Lynn Jackson
Respondent: Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Kyle Vaughn
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?