District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 14,197
Auston v. Davis
as 1:2017cv01097
Petitioner: Melvin F Auston
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2017cv00322
Defendant: Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Petitioner: Corey Cardrey Thomas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acosta v. United States of America.
as 3:2017cv00345
Petitioner: Francisco Javier Acosta
Respondent: United States of America.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores v. Davis
as 3:2017cv00346
Respondent: TDCJ Director Lorie Davis
Petitioner: Eric Flores
Notice Only Party: Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ciriza-Saenz v. United States of America.
as 3:2017cv00344
Petitioner: Mario Alberto Ciriza-Saenz
Respondent: United States of America.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodgers v. Santana Et Al
as 7:2017cv00231
Defendant: Christian Butler, Jesus LNU, Adrian Sanchez and others
Plaintiff: Telena Rodgers
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Davis
as 3:2017cv00341
Respondent: Lori Davis
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Carlos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hope v. Blackwell et al
as 6:2017cv00317
Defendant: Bruce Armstrong, Albert Blackwell, William A. Burroughs and others
Plaintiff: Russell Hope, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00229
Plaintiff: Teddy Charles-Earl Stewart
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hoss v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00230
Plaintiff: Anthony Hoss
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?