US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Van Line Bunkering, Inc. v. Williams
as 2:2017cv00570
Petitioner:
Van Line Bunkering, Inc.
Respondent:
Bryan R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. v. Pritchard
as 2:2017cv00473
Petitioner:
Vane Line Bunkering, Inc
Respondent:
Christopher Pritchard
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
LCC International, Inc. v. Torgerson
as 1:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
LCC International, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Torgerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The BD Listing, LLC v. United Advisors, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00481
Petitioner:
The BD Listing, LLC
Respondent:
United Advisors, LLC and United Atlantic Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tobar Construction, Inc. v. TMG Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00642
Plaintiff:
Tobar Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
TMG Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
SunTrust Investment Services, Inc. v. Hendrick
as 2:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Justin Hendrick
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 689, AFL - CIO
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 689, AFL - CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Saroop et al
as 3:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Interactive Brokers LLC
Defendant:
Rohit Saroop , Preya Saroop and George Sofis
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Cleveland Concrete Construction, Inc. v. T. Gene Edwards, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Concrete Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
T. Gene Edwards, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Moore v. American Online, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01561
Petitioner:
Alvin Lavon Moore
Respondent:
American Online, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
