US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00033
Defendant:
P.A.M. Transport, Inc. and Dependable Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schenk v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00043
Defendant:
Coleman Worldwide Moving LLC and Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Schenk
Lovegrove v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 7:2016cv00274
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vilfrard v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis CO., LPA
as 7:2015cv00429
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bristol Compressors International, Inc. v. Fig Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00006
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Virginia Fuel Corporation
as 2:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Virginia Fuel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Spooltech, LLC v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv00104
Defendant:
FreightQuote.com, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Vortech Automated Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff:
Spooltech, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Naill v. U. S. Bank, National Association
as 3:2010cv00025
Interested Party:
Circuit Court of Louisa County
Plaintiff:
Virginia L. Naill
Defendant:
U. S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Panther II Transportation, Inc. v. Five Star Direct, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Panther II Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Five Star Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Jack v. Dawson
as 5:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Jack
Defendant:
Cutler Dawson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
