US District Court for the District of Vermont Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 170
Mabe v. Vermont Department of Corrections, Commissioner of the et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Mabe
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections, Commissioner of the and State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brink v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2013cv00319
Petitioner:
Ryan Brink
Respondent:
State of Vermont and Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brink v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2013cv00319
Petitioner:
Ryan Brink
Respondent:
State of Vermont and Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wool v. Vermont, State of
as 1:2013cv00312
Petitioner:
Kirk Wool
Respondent:
Vermont, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Pallito
as 5:2013cv00314
Petitioner:
Martin Demetrio Morales
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dodge v. New Hampshire, State of et al
as 1:2013cv00222
Petitioner:
Jonathan H. Dodge
Respondent:
New Hampshire, State of and Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Pallito
as 2:2013cv00211
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Miller
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrasquillo v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00192
Petitioner:
Eddie Carrasquillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rheaume v. Pallito
as 1:2013cv00067
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito
Petitioner:
Allen Rheaume
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkman v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael A. Kirkman
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections , Andrew Pallito , Rose Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
