US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 2,169
Lair-Blakely v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03179
Plaintiff:
William John Lair-Blakely
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Eberle v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Brian Eberle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hieronymus v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Amie Hieronymus
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neff v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05136
Plaintiff:
Brett Neff
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rux v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tricia Rux
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Senaida Garcia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henning v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Teresa Henning
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez Romero v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05134
Plaintiff:
Jenny Gonzalez Romero
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05132
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Murray
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hamberg v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03159
Plaintiff:
Stevie R Hamberg
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
