US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,594
McKinney v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Terry Lee McKinney
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vega v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Alfredo Vega
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eggum v. Severson
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Keith Eggum
Respondent:
Eric J Severson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Racine Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Jaime Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peete v. Noble
as 2:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Christopher Peete
Respondent:
Warden John Noble and John Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moffett v. Jaeger
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Darius Darnell Moffett
Respondent:
Prairie du Chien Correctional Institution and Warden Peter J Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 2:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Steven Dionne Scott
Respondent:
Chris Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Fuchs
as 2:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
James Allen
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
