US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Workman v. Tygart Valley Regional Jail
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Workman
Defendant:
Tygart Valley Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Latasha Curtis
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. McCaffery
as 3:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Brittany Dawn Thomas
Respondent:
R McCaffery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gist v. Salem Correction Center & Jail
as 5:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gist
Defendant:
Salem Correction Center & Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Savanah Pauline Justice
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Creef v. McCaffery
as 3:2022cv00071
Petitioner:
Randi Brooke Creef
Respondent:
R McCaffery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lose v. West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert William Lose, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation and NCRJ Correction Staffing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Daniel
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Cpt. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Welch
Defendant:
Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical and Correctional Officer Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ONeal v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Lavar ONeal
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
