Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 157,473
Ohlberg v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Ohlberg
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv10972
Plaintiff:
Twanzette Smith
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McBrien v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Casey Dale McBrien
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stein v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Stein
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vaillancourt v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Alexander N. Vaillancourt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hartner v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Claire Olivia Hartner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Utter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Utter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Melendez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Christine Melendez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Knapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06215
Plaintiff:
Jennifer I. Knapp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woodcock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06216
Plaintiff:
Melissa Woodcock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
