Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 396,221
CROCKETT III v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02297
Petitioner: WILLIAM BERNARD CROCKETT III
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UI-HASSAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00543
Petitioner: MAHMOUD UI-HASSAN and MAHMOOD UI-HASSAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
THOMPSON v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff: JERRY THOMPSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carnahan v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv01272
Petitioner: Gerald Carnahan
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beavers v. Commander Kowalski et al
as 9:2022cv00188
Petitioner: Ronald J. Beavers
Respondent: Commander Kowalski and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv06877
Petitioner: CARLOS SMITH PITTERSON
Defendant: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baum v. Warden Jansen
as 2:2022cv04293
Petitioner: Maurice Baum
Respondent: Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00301
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vessell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01010
Petitioner: Leon Dale Vessell
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Preciado v. Eastern State Hospital
as 1:2022cv03187
Petitioner: Emanuel Mejia Preciado
Respondent: Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?