Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 828,342
USA v. Gregory Makozy, Sr.
as 17-2156
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GREGORY M. MAKOZY, SR.
Fred Wilson v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 17-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRED WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
US v. Antonio Moore
as 17-6671
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANTONIO JERMAINE MOORE, a/k/a 10-4
Drewry v. ME Department of Correction, et al
as 17-1535
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD ABBOTT, THOMAS AVERILL, NATHAN STAPLES, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6673
Petitioner - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Turuk Saunders v. Warden of Broad River Prison
as 17-6674
Petitioner - Appellant: TURUK SAUNDERS, a/k/a Turick Frazier
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Michael Barner v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 17-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL E. BARNER
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS MACKIE, Warden, LORI DUMAS, Registered Nurse, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as John/Jane Doe I, ECF Health Care Medical Administrator and others
Henry Bullock v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20356
Petitioner - Appellant: HENRY RICHARD BULLOCK
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Douglas Schaap v. Raymond Madden
as 17-16086
Petitioner - Appellant: DOUGLAS L. SCHAAP
Respondent - Appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN
Michael Price v. Bobby Cummings, et al
as 17-50453
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL L. PRICE
Defendant - Appellee: JUDGE BOBBY L. CUMMINGS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DUSTY BOYD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILLIP ZEIGLER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?