US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. MacLeroy et al
as 2:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Yance E. Macleroy and Firenze II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Phaneuf
as 3:2014cv00611
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Malcolm David Phaneuf
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Chavez
as 3:2013cv00709
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sergio Chavez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Blair
as 1:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. , EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC
Defendant:
Erika Blair
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Powell
as 2:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. , EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC
Defendant:
Elbert Powell
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Zuffa, LLC v. Taapken
as 3:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Allen Brent Taapken
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Allen Brent Taapken
Thirdparty_defendant:
Greene Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Zuffa, LLC v. Patel et al
as 2:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Piyush A. Patel and PLK 10, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Reyes
as 3:2010cv01032
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cesar Camos Reyes
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Reyes et al
as 3:2010cv01031
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cesar Camos Reyes and Hosea Campos Reyes
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tucker Brantley Brown and Touchdown's Pub N Eatery, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
