US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,593
Norman v. White
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Norman
Defendant:
Ell White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Inc., Alimentation Couche-Tard, Brian Hannasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc., Alimentation Couche-Tard, Brian Hannasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. United States of America et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
United States of America and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Echenique v. Biden et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00534
Defendant:
Lamela Solomon, Julian Lennon, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Opp City Police Dept et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Y. McIntosh
Defendant:
Opp City Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard
Defendant:
Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Masingo v. McCartney et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Jason Masingo
Defendant:
Corry McCartney and Matthew Foshee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laakkonen v. Bailes
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Patrick Laakkonen
Defendant:
Shane Bailes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Ragland et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Y. McIntosh
Defendant:
Camron Ragland, Thomas Price, Mark Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
