US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 121 - 130 of 2,573
Witt et al v. Brookside, Alabama, the town of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00773
Defendant: Former Chief Mike Jones, Officer Sellers, Brookside, Alabama, the town of and others
Plaintiff: Vincent L Witt, Tareya Witt and Brenda Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Chames et al
as 1:2021cv00769
Plaintiff: Toni Jones
Defendant: Butterworth, Shelia Fields, Chames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Underwood et al
as 3:2021cv00757
Defendant: Luster Echols and Mayor Kerry Underwood
Plaintiff: Clayborn D. Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Woodfin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00751
Defendant: ED Fields, Investigator Thomas, Johnny Rocket and others
Plaintiff: Ervin Rayfield and Rayfield Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amistead v. Hunt-Hilliard et al
as 2:2021cv00750
Plaintiff: Andrew Albert Amistead
Defendant: John L Bodie, Jason J Bonar and Janine Hunt-Hilliard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Willis
as 5:2021cv00745
Plaintiff: Felicia H Watkins
Defendant: Ann Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. United States of America et al
as 7:2021cv00735
Defendant: C Potter, E Knopp, Angel Ortiz and others
Plaintiff: Kenteshia Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Blaylock v. Ivey et al
as 2:2021cv00728
Plaintiff: Kristen Blaylock
Defendant: Kay Ivey and Scott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taft v. Ivey et al
as 2:2021cv00726
Defendant: Kay Ivey and Dr. Scott Harris
Plaintiff: Rose Taft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Ivey et al
as 6:2021cv00729
Plaintiff: Josh Adams
Defendant: Kay Ivey and Scott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?