US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 51 - 60 of 53,665
Von Hor v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Von Hor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Taylor Wells
Defendant:
Payton Nicole Gann, Hannah Grace Letson and LEACHCO Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Craig v. Fidelity Investments
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markel Craig, Jr
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Title Max of Alabama Inc
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markel Craig, Jr
Defendant:
Title Max of Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Bishop
as 5:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Christina Carter
Defendant:
Patrick Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
LeKeith Antwon Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Tracy Walden
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Woodbrook Apartments
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Camillia Williams
Defendant:
Woodbrook Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
