US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 364
Carter v. Meese, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Duane Ruben Carter
Defendant:
Meese, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00218
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Parker J. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
Gregory Odom
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Mariah Taylor
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Morsine Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randolph Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finley v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Veronica Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackmon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00556
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
LaWanda Blackmon and Thomas O. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
