US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,127
James v. Scully
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Freddie D. James
Defendant:
William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luckey v. Godwin et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Kristy Godwin, Southern Health Partner, Elizabeth Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Pickens
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Escambia County Corrections
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Escambia County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. White et al
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Cooper
Defendant:
Tiffany White and Darrell McMann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calderwood v. Rivers et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Coldwood and Donald Joseph Calderwood
Defendant:
Danny Eugene Rivers, Brandon Barnhill and Pilot Corporate Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomason v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Thomason
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Deputy Warden Houston and Captain Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson and Lieutenant Pat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Escambia County Sheriff Department
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Donal Ray Edwards
Defendant:
Escambia County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Shaw et al
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Theron Riley, Jr
Defendant:
Calvin Shaw and Gretchen Rooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.