U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 274
Downey v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Downey
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
White v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Shawn White
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zirlott v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zirlott
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kemp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
George Kemp
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Mitchell
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Workman v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Workman
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Livings v. Transportation Auction Consultants, LLC
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Chris Livings
Defendant:
Transportation Auction Consultants, LLC doing business as TAC Auction Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Caves et al v. Grady Dortch and Sons, Inc.
as 1:2023mc00005
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Caves and Roosevelt Sanders
Defendant:
Grady Dortch and Sons, Inc.
Fraticelli v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jose Fraticelli
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pleasants v. Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Sonya Gladney Pleasants
Defendant:
Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
