Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,158
Coleman v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00863
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Plaintiff:
Karina Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Febles v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Kristie Febles
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Parker v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Maritta Parker
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dunnigan v. Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University et al
as 5:2024cv00844
Defendant:
Kimberly Davis-Burks, Lisa A Spencer, Steven Dubose and others
Plaintiff:
La'Saundra Dunnigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tanner v. Aldous & Associates, PLLC
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Robert Tanner
Defendant:
Aldous & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hanks v. Ascension St. Vincent's Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Defendant:
Ascension St. Vincent's Hospital, Dr. John Doe, M.D., Dr. David W Smith, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Georgette B Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Taylor v. Professional Collection Services
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Anesha Taylor
Defendant:
Professional Collection Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kidd v. Wakefield & Associates LLC
as 1:2024cv00802
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
Martha Kidd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kidd v. National Credit Adjusters LLC
as 1:2024cv00801
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters LLC
Plaintiff:
Martha Kidd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ford v. National Credit Adjusters LLC
as 5:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Teriona Ford
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
