Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,497
Becerra-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Becerra-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tori Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meece v. USA
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Nicole Lynn Meece
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Willie Dion Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sells v. USA
as 1:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Donald Scott Sells
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tucker v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08003
Petitioner:
Devonte Jaishun Tucker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marshall v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Marshall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Korcz v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08002
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Korcz, MD
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nettisia Mitchell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Underwood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08001
Petitioner:
Curtis Underwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
