Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,549
Bradham v. Washington (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ervin Bradham
Defendant:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tormey v. Washington (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mark Tormey
Defendant:
Milton Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pugh v. Gordy

as 2:2025cv00075
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Pugh
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Neeley et al
as 7:2025cv00295
Petitioner:
Marcia Cunningham
Respondent:
Neeley and FCI Aliceville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dryer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2025cv00074
Petitioner:
Marcus Dryer
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Matthews v. Yeager
as 1:2025cv00288
Petitioner:
Keandre Matthews
Respondent:
D. Yeager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stoudemire v. Gordy
as 2:2025cv00291
Petitioner:
David Stoudemire
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. State of Alabama
as 7:2025cv00293
Petitioner:
Vertis Jerome Anthony
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carden v. Gordy (INMATE 1)

as 2:2025cv00158
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Crow (INMATE 2)

as 2:2025cv00255
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Defendant:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.