Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,785
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pleasant v. Yescare (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ray Dean Pleasant
Defendant:
Yescare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Osborn
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby Presley
Defendant:
Stefan Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mcneal
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
