Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,911
Barrett v. Jackson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00538
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail Administration, Officer Bates, Officer Sweeny and others
Plaintiff:
George Harvey Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Walker et al
as 7:2024cv01160
Defendant:
Yates, Jonathon Horton, Deputy Peek and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Derrell Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Russell County Sheriff Dept. et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00535
Defendant:
Russell County Medical and B. Lewis
Plaintiff:
Darryl F. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Baldwin County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Baldwin County Jail and Officer Lane
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ringold v. Houston et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Defendant:
Officer Paul Burch and Sam Houston
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Ringold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dailey v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01139
Defendant:
Mrs Morgan, Mr. Hamm, Mr Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Michael et al
as 5:2024cv01134
Defendant:
Head Mental Health Nurse and Evans Michael
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv01138
Defendant:
Nicholas Mueller and Joshua Fleming
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Gang Members
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00519
Defendant:
John Crow, Pamela Harris, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Keshon Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
