District of Alabama Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Other Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 142
United States of America v. A NORINCO SKS 7.62 X 39-MM Rifle, SN 9002355 et al
as 4:2016cv02030
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: A NORINCO SKS 7.62 X 39-MM Rifle, SN 9002355, A H&R 1871 PARDNER 20 Guage Shotgun, SN693036, A MAVERICK MODEL 88 12 Guage Shotgun, SN MV23812J and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $299,873.70 seized from a Bank of America Account et al
as 1:2016cv00545
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $299,873.70 seized from a Bank of America Account, Approximately $191,260.60 seized from a Bank of America Account, Approximately $299,945.00 seized from an East West Bank Account and others
Cause Of Action: (a)(1)(A) Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. One Gray Tower Computer Bearing a Label Stating Powered By Asus and Containing an Internal Hard Drive Bearing the Model Number WD1001FALS and the Serial Number WMATV0976768
as 4:2016cv01749
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Gray Tower Computer Bearing a Label Stating Powered By Asus and Containing an Internal Hard Drive Bearing the Model Number WD1001FALS and the Serial Number WMATV0976768
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture
United States of America v. One Parcel of Property Located at 6864 West Lode Drive, Unit #3A, Worth, Cook Couty, Illinois, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon et al
as 1:2016cv00831
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Parcel of Property Located at 6864 West Lode Drive, Unit #3A, Worth, Cook Couty, Illinois, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon , One Parcel of Property Located at 9301 South Meade Street, Oak Lawn, Cook County, Illinois, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon , One Parcel of Property Located at 9645 Ridgeland Avenue, Unit #202, Oak Lawn, Cook County, Illinois, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon and others
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. $19,728.00 in United States Currency (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00787
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $19,728.00 in United States Currency, Ivory Vernell Nevels
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. A Fabrica De Armas S.E.A.M. Model Oviedo 1923, 7mm Caliber Rifle, SN 2L7407 et al
as 1:2016cv01346
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: A Fabrica De Armas S.E.A.M. Model Oviedo 1923, 7mm Caliber Rifle, SN 2L7407, A Spike's Tactical LLC ST15 Multi-Caliber Rifle Receiver/Frame, SN SBR32404
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $441,000.00 in U.S. Currency (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $441,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. $20,000.00 seized from Pentagon Federal Credit Union Account Number xxxxx4-025 in the name of Theodore S. Hudson and/or Adelina C. Hudson et al ( JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2016cv00205
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $20,000.00 seized from Pentagon Federal Credit Union Account Number xxxxx4-025 in the name of Theodore S. Hudson and/or Adelina C. Hudson, $33,869.44 seized from Fifth Third Bank Account Number xxxxxxxx0283 in the name of Husam U. Tayeh or Fatima Khudeira, $140,920.18 seized from Fifth Third Bank Account Number xxxxxxxx4453 in the name of Luxury Trade, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One Remington Arms .22 caliber rifle
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: One Remington Arms .22 caliber rifle
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One Glock et al
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: One Glock, One Mossberg 835, One Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?