District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 51 - 60 of 90,060
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Donnie Thomas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martignoni v. Coppins et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Mckenna Marie Martignoni
Defendant:
Katrice D Coppins and Publix Super Markets Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Denise L Orr
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William E. White, Jr.
Defendant:
Houchens Food Group, Inc. and Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
as 2:2024mc04020
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. UAB Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Eddie Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
UAB Hospital, MD Ashish B Shah, Megan Allmendinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
