U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,027
Thomas v. Indian Health Service et al
as 3:2025cv00098
Plaintiff:
Andrew V. Thomas
Defendant:
Indian Health Service and Alaska Native Medical Center
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hanlon v. Lorenzo et al
as 3:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
James J. Hanlon
Defendant:
Osburt John Lorenzo, Tricia K. Tank and Brian Kurt Penner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woitel v. Brook et al
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
David Nicholas Woitel
Defendant:
Theodore Glenn Brook and Kathi Forgue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darden vs. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2025cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thomas House Darden
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage, David Noll, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poffenbarger v. Gleason et al
as 3:2025cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Hon. Sharon Gleason, Key bank N.A., Experian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Basargin v. City of Homer, Alaska et al
as 3:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kiril Zahary Basargin
Defendant:
City of Homer, Alaska, Morgan Tracy, Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braswell v. Lothrop et al
as 3:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cyrus DA Braswell
Defendant:
William Lothrop, Harley G. Lappin, Unknown/Unnamed and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jackson v. Saxby, et al
as 3:2025cv00056
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin M. Saxby, Katholyn A. Runnels and Candice M Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v Micciche et al
as 3:2025cv00054
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Conner
Defendant:
Mayor Peter Micciche and Kenai Peninsula Borough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
