District of Alaska Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 4,819
First Insurance Funding Corp. v. Black Gold Express, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff: First Insurance Funding Corp.
Defendant: Black Gold Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Duron v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00147
Plaintiff: Deidre Leanora Duron
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Great Divide Insurance Company v. Hartman et al
as 3:2017cv00148
Plaintiff: Great Divide Insurance Company
Defendant: David Hartman, Linda Hartman, Hartman Construction & Equipment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Cathey v. Matsu Property Officer et al
as 3:2017cv00150
Petitioner: King David Cathey
Respondent: Matsu Property Officer, ACCE Property Officer, ACCW Property Officer and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Washington
as 3:2017cv00149
Defendant: Antonio D. Washington
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cathey v. AK Dept of Corrections Medical et al
as 3:2017cv00151
Petitioner: King David Cathey
Respondent: AK Dept of Corrections Medical, David Knapp, Rob Larson and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eucebio v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00146
Plaintiff: Juan Manuel Eucebio
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barry v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: William Scott Barry
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hart v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00145
Plaintiff: Troy D. Hart
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Lapitre v. Lapinskas
as 3:2017cv00143
Plaintiff: Steve Claudy Lapitre
Defendant: William Lapinskas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?