U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 366
Noble et al v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
Kevin Noble and Andrea Noble
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Treadstone Insurance PCC et al
as 2:2015mc00046
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Treadstone Insurance PCC and Ingenuity Matrix Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Harper et al
as 2:2015cv01090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dana B Harper, International Investment Source, Sun American Development LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Noone et al v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv08102
Plaintiff:
Robert V Noone and Robert V Noone Incorporated
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Namaca Management v. Wray et al
as 2:2015cv00257
Defendant:
Ginger L Wray and John Koskinen
Plaintiff:
Namaca Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riyad v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00192
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mohammad A Riyad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Sprenger
as 2:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis J Sprenger
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Today.com Incorporated et al

as 2:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Today.com Incorporated, Nathan W Gwilliam, Dale R Gwilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Waddell et al v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00075
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
J Craig Waddell and Coralie Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bailey v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv02471
Plaintiff:
Donald D Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.