US District Court for the District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,566
Millan v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv02045
Petitioner:
Oscar Millan
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ireland v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Kristin Ireland
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham #360525 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Carnell Antoin Cunningham
Defendant:
NaphCare, Unknown Vargas and Unknown Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M Rios, T Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Bollinger #328092 v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Bollinger
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated and Grace Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
Ronnie Eugene Holland
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunnell v. Coconino County Jail
as 3:2023cv08560
Plaintiff:
Charles William Bunnell, II
Defendant:
Coconino County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno #166076 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herberto Moreno
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, David Shinn, Unknown Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clevenger v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
JuilieAnne M Clevenger
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
