Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34,697
Essenfeld v. Phelan
as 4:2025cv00293
Petitioner:
Theodore E Essenfeld
Respondent:
John Phelan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Essenfeld v. Dulgov
as 4:2025cv00294
Petitioner:
Theodore E Essenfeld
Respondent:
Unknown Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cota v. Yavapai County Public Defender's Office
as 3:2025cv08121
Plaintiff:
Jacob Anthony Cota
Defendant:
Yavapai County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce #232807 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv02067
Plaintiff:
John Balla Pierce
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Esteban Aguirre, Mannita Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Zamora et al
as 4:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Defendant:
Unknown Zamora, Unknown Party, Unknown Eslice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bateman v. USA
as 3:2025cv08118
Petitioner:
Samuel Rappylee Bateman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Unknown Party
as 4:2025cv00289
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carrasco-Ferrel #252394 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv02049
Plaintiff:
Steven Carrasco-Ferrel
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina et al v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2025cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jose Fabian Molina and Patrick Aaron Riedel
Defendant:
Pima County Jail, NaphCare, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kakar v. USA
as 4:2025cv00287
Petitioner:
Zachary Arthur Kakar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
