Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 34,689
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Upchurch v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jack D Upchurch
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima County Jail, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo #093622 v. USA
as 4:2025cv00280
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Lugo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lyman #159608 v. Credio
as 2:2025cv01936
Petitioner:
Alexandro Lyman and Alexandro Layman
Respondent:
Unknown Credio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge #142462 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv01947
Petitioner:
Jermaine Lamar Rutledge
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdullah #271958 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2025cv01932
Plaintiff:
Haider Abdullah
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman #159608 v. Credio
as 2:2025cv01934
Plaintiff:
Alexandro Lyman
Defendant:
Unknown Credio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah #271958 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv01946
Plaintiff:
Haider Abdullah
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, CoreCivic, Kieth Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavarrete v. Unknown Party
as 4:2025cv00266
Petitioner:
Patric Gavarrete
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cisneros-Flores v. United States of America et al
as 4:2025cv00267
Petitioner:
Alejandro Cisneros-Flores
Respondent:
United States of America and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
