Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 33,276
Mirro #057434 v. Karumba
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Mirro, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Karumba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #155260 v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Bryan William Smith
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olguin #211897 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Eric Samual Olguin
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. USA
as 3:2024cv08062
Petitioner:
Duane Thomas Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Regenold #231948 v. United States District Court
as 2:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Regenold
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Briscol v. Maricopa County Correction
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A Briscol
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younan #173538 v. Washburn
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Stewart Edward Younan
Defendant:
Unknown Washburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Mikado Nabob Thompson, Damian Richards, Shotta and others
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lomas v. Gunther et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Christopher Brandon Lomas
Respondent:
Unknown Gunther and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drew v. Equity Lifestyle Properties et al
as 3:2024cv08050
Plaintiff:
Corey Drew
Defendant:
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Thousand Trails, MHC Property Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
