US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,688
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Healy v. KAJACS Contractors Inc
as 4:2023cv01047
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sanofi-Aventis US LLC v. McClain
as 4:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Alan McClain
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventis US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Shackelford v. Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Services PA
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jody Shackelford
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Services PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Gulfside Casino Partnership v. Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00592
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation Entertainment LLC, Jordan Sowers, David Ivy and others
Plaintiff:
Gulfside Casino Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
