US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 839
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Ross
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge Quincey Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fiorentino v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino and The Fool
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jesty v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05025
Plaintiff:
Judge Jesty and Shane Fiorentino
Defendant:
You, The Legislature, The President and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jackson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jackson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Wilcox
Defendant:
Gregg L. Alexander and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattingly v. McCune et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Arron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jackson
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
