U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 927
Parks v. Holmes et al
as 2:2025cv02009
Plaintiff:
Kristopher O. Parks
Defendant:
Kevin Holmes, Tim Griffin and Sarah Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ho v. Arkansas, State of
as 2:2025cv02002
Plaintiff:
Tam Ho
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felton v. Fayetteville Police Department et al
as 5:2025cv05001
Defendant:
Fayetteville Police Department and Washington County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
David Edward Felton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Babin v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv03057
Defendant:
Aspen Insurance U.S. Services, Inc., Sherry Hilton, Jennifer Zappa and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle (Missy) Babin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parks v. Garland
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Orion Parks
Defendant:
US Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. Sanders et al
as 2:2024cv02160
Defendant:
Governor of Arkansas Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Tim Griffin
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Orion Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2024cv04124
Defendant:
Shane Reynolds, Shawn Reynolds, Ernest Jack Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Richard v. Covenant Recovery et al

as 6:2024cv06160
Defendant:
Covenant Recovery, Program Director Bryan Donoho and Jeremy Mckenzie
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Ohio Club Bar

as 6:2024cv06161
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Richard
Defendant:
Ohio Club Bar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Hot Springs City Police Dept et al

as 6:2024cv06159
Defendant:
Michael Jeffrey, Hot Springs City Police Dept and Lieutenant Shawn Stapleton
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.