U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 788
Mears v. Tyson Poultry, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
David Mears
Defendant:
Tyson Poultry, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Barnes v. Atlas Telecommunications LLC
as 3:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
Robert Barnes
Defendant:
Atlas Telecommunications LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Edens v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The
as 5:2024cv05062
Plaintiff:
Cathy Edens
Defendant:
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Weston v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Ashley Weston
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Coble v. SOHDental, LLC
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Misty Coble
Defendant:
Sohdental, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Tripp v. MaxAuto Detailing, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv05009
Plaintiff:
Orlando Tripp
Defendant:
MaxAuto Detailing, LLC and Trudy Balsamel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Crouch v. Royal Overhead Door, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05001
Plaintiff:
Travis Crouch
Defendant:
Royal Overhead Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Popp v. Precision Led Lighting LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03002
Plaintiff:
Montana Popp
Defendant:
Precision Led Lighting LLC and Tyler Chase Tedder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pippen v. PLD Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06143
Plaintiff:
John Pippen
Defendant:
PLD Transport, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Peterman v. Manhattan Road & Bridge Company
as 6:2023cv06144
Plaintiff:
John Peterman
Defendant:
Manhattan Road & Bridge Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
